Stella Case Study: Scaling Google Ads Profitably by Reframing ROAS Targets
How a $17M ecommerce brand uncovered the underreported impact of its most important channel through incrementality testing
Overview
A national athletic apparel brand partnered with Stella in July 2024 to evaluate the true business impact of its Google Ads investment. Despite consistently strong platform-reported performance (6.0 ROAS), leadership suspected the actual contribution to revenue was higher. Stella’s incrementality testing confirmed this hypothesis, revealing that Google Ads was generating 60% more incremental revenue than reported. This allowed the brand to adjust ROAS targets and scale spend confidently.
Objective
Quantify the incremental return on ad spend (iROAS) from Google Ads using causal inference and apply that insight to guide budget and bidding strategy.
Ad Strategy Breakdown (Before Testing)
The brand’s Google Ads budget was thoughtfully diversified across multiple campaign types and conversion stages:
Performance Max (~60% of budget)
Optimized specifically for new customer acquisition (a setting available within Google Ads)
Majority of delivery occurred through Product Listing Ads (PLAs)
Designed to efficiently capture high-intent shoppers while feeding the funnel with new-to-file customers
YouTube (~30%)
Focused on brand awareness and retargeting, using strong creative in immersive, high-attention environments
These campaigns were not optimized for clicks, but rather for broader influence on consideration and intent
Non-Branded Search (~8%)
Targeted mid-funnel discovery behaviors—users searching category-level or competitor terms
Branded Search (~2%)
Captured users searching directly for the brand (e.g., “[Brand Name] leggings”)
Spend was minimal due to strong organic rankings and high brand familiarity
The Incrementality Study
Implementing Stella's Incrementality Tool
Experiment Design
Methodology: Geo-based causal impact modeling
Pre-period: 120 days of historical sales by region
Test period: August to July 2024 (45 days)
Primary metric: Total revenue by region
Structure: Test locations were selected from Stella's location selection tool and control regions were built by synthetic weighted controls
Stella’s model constructed a synthetic control group that estimated what would have happened in test regions without Google Ads. This baseline was then compared to actual results to calculate lift.
*The chart below is from Stella's old UI. Our current 2025 UI has evolved a lot since this screenshot was taken making it much easier to interpret the key findings.
Model Results
Platform ROAS: 6.0
Incremental ROAS (iROAS): 10.11
Incrementality Factor: 10 ÷ 6 = 1.67
Statistical Significance: p < 0.01
Model Accuracy:
MAPE = 8.9%
R² = 0.82
This meant that for every $1 Google Ads claimed in reported revenue, the true incremental lift was $1.67, a 67% increase. Model diagnostics confirmed a strong fit and high reliability.
Strategic Application
With a validated incrementality factor, the brand adjusted its approach to budgeting and target-setting:
New ROAS Target 6.0 (iROAS goal) ÷ 1.67 = ~3.6 platform ROAS This gave the brand confidence to scale spend without sacrificing profitability
Execution Plan
Increased Google Ads budget by approximately 20% weekly
Gradually lowered ROAS targets by approximately 10% each week
Transitioned primary success metric from platform ROAS to MER (Marketing Efficiency Ratio)
Why Incrementality Was Likely Underreported
Two key factors in the brand’s setup suggested Google’s actual revenue contribution was being under-credited:
YouTube’s High Incrementality YouTube campaigns, especially those not optimized for conversions, often influence purchase behavior without being directly credited in platform attribution. These placements contribute to incremental lift that is invisible to last-click or platform models.
New Customer Optimization By using Google’s new customer acquisition goal within Performance Max, the brand trained the algorithm to find buyers who were unlikely to convert otherwise. This naturally raised the channel’s true incremental value beyond what platform-reported metrics could reflect.
Strategy Implementation
With a validated incrementality factor, the brand adjusted its approach to budgeting and target-setting:
New ROAS Target 6.0 (iROAS goal) ÷ 1.67 = ~3.6 platform ROAS This gave the brand confidence to scale spend without sacrificing profitability
Execution Plan
Increased Google Ads budget by approximately 20% weekly
Gradually lowered ROAS targets by approximately 10% each week
Transitioned primary success metric from platform ROAS to MER (Marketing Efficiency Ratio)
Results
An analysis of the data from June to October 2024 demonstrates the impact of the implemented strategy (Study finished August 17th):
Observed Results (June to October 2024)
Weekly Google Spend: Increased from $18,702 to $29,553
Weekly Total Revenue: Grew from $341,129 to $497,114
MER (Total Revenue ÷ Total Ad Spend): Improved from 3.00 to 4.45, a 48% increase
Google-reported conversion value: Remained mostly flat, confirming attribution blind spots
Even as in-platform ROAS declined (as expected when scaling), MER increased steadily, signaling real business growth driven by expanded spend.
Key Takeaways
ROAS is not the ceiling Platform-reported ROAS significantly underrepresented actual value
YouTube and new customer tactics drive high iROAS The channel mix helped explain the 1.67x lift
MER is a better north star As the brand scaled spend, MER tracked overall efficiency more reliably than ROAS
Implications for Other Brands
This study illustrates how incrementality testing can unlock profitable scale. Many brands unintentionally constrain growth by holding channels to platform-reported ROAS targets that ignore invisible impact. Stella helps reveal the full picture.
With Stella, brands can:
Calculate the true iROAS of each channel
Adjust spend targets based on real business outcomes
Use MER to guide holistic marketing decisions at scale